Official property records
Pepys Hill Condominium: recorded history
Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.
Property Upside score
Eight dimensions of the evidence for this property.
35% evidence coverage · 3 of 8 applicable dimensions scored
The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.
Strongest supported dimension: Connectivity (100). Lowest supported dimension: URA growth catalysts (55).
Value20% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.
Resale demand15% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.
Rental appeal10% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. Requires current recorded rental contracts or published project rental medians. Reporting continuity is a proxy; unmatched rent and floor area never produce a yield.
Connectivity15% weight100/100
Pasir Panjang MRT is approximately 321 m away in a straight line.
How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.
- Nearest sourced MRT: Pasir Panjang MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight75/100
Proximity to four everyday amenity categories using stored official locations. Straight-line distances; access and suitability vary.
How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.
Tenure resilience15% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.
URA growth catalysts10% weight55/100
Greater Southern Waterfront: Phased; individual sites remain subject to planning. Matched using Pasir Panjang MRT as a reference.
How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.
- Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 1.4. (2026-09-06) Source
- Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
- Greater Southern Waterfront: Planned; Phased; individual sites remain subject to planning. Approx. 321 m straight-line to Pasir Panjang MRT reference. URA identifies new waterfront homes and public spaces, including the former Keppel Golf Course and Pasir Panjang Power District. New housing can compete with existing homes, and delivery depends on individual sites. This is proximity to a regional reference station, not a boundary or completion guarantee. (2026-09-06) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · No reviewed activity · Unscored—
No reviewed collective-sale activity in this limited catalogue. This does not establish that no activity exists. Redevelopment feasibility is not established.
How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.
- Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 1.4. (2026-09-06) Source
- Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
Announcement sources last checked 7 Sep 2026, 03:00 SGT. Monitored sources and latest verified updates.
Know of a committee, consent exercise or tender update? Submit dated evidence as a factual correction. Submissions require review and do not automatically change the score.
An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.
Condominium · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Freehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.
Fair value & asking price
A 3,040 sq ft property in Pepys Hill Condominium
Small sample · Based on 2 matching sales over 5 years. Individual transactions can materially change the median and range. With two sales, the median is their midpoint and the range is interpolated between them.
S$4,227,500 – S$4,242,500
Middle 50% of recorded prices
2 comparable sales over 5 years
Recent comparable sale is S$15,000 lower than the benchmark.
Recorded sale from 2024-03. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.
- Median price / sq ft
- S$1,405
- Comparable sales
- 2Past 5 years
- Recorded PSF change
- Limited historyNeeds five sales in each year
- Recorded tenure
- Freehold
Comparable recorded prices over time
Individual recorded sales per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property
Each dot is a completed sale. There are too few sales per period for a supported median trend, so no trend line or growth rate is inferred. View the recorded prices and sizes.
Price versus other developments
District 05 · Freehold
Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by number of recorded sales. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.
Local market context
Against other district 05 transactions
12 matching sales in other developments over 5 years. A price percentile needs five sales here and at least 20 elsewhere.
Price versus the local market
The distribution of district 05 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties
12 matching market sales are available; at least 20 are needed for this distribution.
What traded in this development
Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months
No matching sales were recorded in the past 12 months.
The sales behind the comparison
2,584–3,496 sq ft · Past 5 years
| Month | Size | Floor band | Recorded price | Price / sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03 | 3035 sq ft | 1–5 | S$4,220,000 | S$1,390 |
| 2024-03 | 2992 sq ft | 1–5 | S$4,250,000 | S$1,420 |
Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 2 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.
How to read this analysis
The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.
Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 16:03 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology
Charts & price evidence
Understand what these records can tell you.
Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.
All property records
Pepys Hill Condominium · Every recorded date, size and property type
All published history, including archived records. No date, size, flat-type, sale-category, tenure or unit-count exclusions. Source corrections use the latest published record; all 0 retained source versions are also available.
No building records records have been supplied by the connected sources for this property. View source coverage.
Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.