Official property records

Beauty World Plaza: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

What helps, what holds it back, and the evidence behind each score.

Insufficient evidenceOverall score not yet available
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Connectivity: 100 out of 100URA growth catalysts: 60 out of 100 ValueResaledemandRentalappealConnectivity100EverydaylivingTenureresilienceURA growthcatalysts60En blocpotential

25% evidence coverage · 2 of 8 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Connectivity (100). Lowest supported dimension: URA growth catalysts (60).

Value20% weight · UnscoredOnly 2 compatible sales are available in this comparison. At least 5 are needed to score value, so a small sample does not become a good or bad price verdict.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

Resale demand15% weight · UnscoredWe cannot yet judge how regularly homes in this segment resell. This needs at least 5 matching resales and a source covering 12 completed months; missing records are not evidence of weak demand.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

Rental appeal10% weight · UnscoredThe available rental records do not yet support a score. We need matching contracts across a fully covered year, or at least 2 published project rental medians across 4 covered quarters. This does not mean the property is hard to rent.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Requires current recorded rental contracts or published project rental medians. Reporting continuity is a proxy; unmatched rent and floor area never produce a yield.

Connectivity15% weight100/100The nearest recorded operational MRT is Beauty World MRT, approximately 102 m away. Being within 400 m earns the highest band, 100 points. This is straight-line distance; the actual walking route may be longer.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Beauty World MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · UnscoredWe do not have current, verified nearby location evidence for food, shopping. All four everyday amenity categories are needed for a fair score. This does not mean those amenities are absent.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight · UnscoredThe selected sale records do not establish a consistent, usable tenure or remaining lease. We need an explicit freehold title or enough lease information to calculate the years left.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

URA growth catalysts10% weight60/100Cross Island Line phase 2 is the strongest matched catalyst. Construction is under way, starting at 80 points under our delivery-stage rules. The property is approximately 1,088 m from the King Albert Park MRT reference. Being farther from that reference subtracts 20 points, giving 60/100. This measures proximity and delivery stage, not future price growth. Timing and project details are in the evidence below.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Commercial & Residential; gross plot ratio 3.0. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
  • Cross Island Line phase 2: Under construction; 2032 (LTA target). Approx. 1,088 m straight-line to King Albert Park MRT reference. The Cross Island Line will add an interchange with the existing line, opening additional travel connections in the west. Benefits arrive over a longer horizon, with construction nearby in the meantime. Distance uses the existing station reference, not the future entrance. (2026-09-06) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · No reviewed activity · UnscoredNo reviewed collective-sale activity in this limited catalogue. This does not establish that no activity exists. Redevelopment feasibility is not established.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Commercial & Residential; gross plot ratio 3.0. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source

Announcement sources last checked 7 Sep 2026, 03:00 SGT. Monitored sources and latest verified updates.

Know of a committee, consent exercise or tender update? Submit dated evidence as a factual correction. Submissions require review and do not automatically change the score.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

Apartment · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · 999-year leasehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 810 sq ft property in Beauty World Plaza

Comparable sales

Small sample · Based on 2 matching sales over 5 years. Individual transactions can materially change the median and range. With two sales, the median is their midpoint and the range is interpolated between them.

Comparable-sale benchmarkS$1,310,000

S$1,205,000 – S$1,415,000

Middle 50% of recorded prices
2 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$210,000 higher than the benchmark.

16.0%above the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$1,520,000
Comparable medianS$1,310,000
S$0S$2,100,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2025-04. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$1,607
Comparable sales
2Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
Limited historyNeeds five sales in each year
Recorded tenure
999-year leasehold

Comparable recorded prices over time

Individual recorded sales per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

2023-04–2025-04
2 individual recorded sales in the selected size band. Dots are actual prices, not a price trend or valuation. 1,4151,5131,6111,7081,806 2023-04: S$1,572 / sq ft · S$1,100,000 · 700 sq ft2025-04: S$1,642 / sq ft · S$1,520,000 · 926 sq ft 2023-042025-04

Each dot is a completed sale. There are too few sales per period for a supported median trend, so no trend line or growth rate is inferred. View the recorded prices and sizes.

Price versus other developments

District 21 · 999-year leasehold

A price comparison needs at least two developments with five comparable sales each. There are not enough in this size band and period.

Local market context

Against other district 21 transactions

1 matching sales in other developments over 5 years. A price percentile needs five sales here and at least 20 elsewhere.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of district 21 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

1 matching market sales are available; at least 20 are needed for this distribution.

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

No matching sales were recorded in the past 12 months.

The sales behind the comparison

689–932 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2025-04926 sq ft1–5S$1,520,000S$1,642
2023-04700 sq ft6–10S$1,100,000S$1,572

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 2 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 16:03 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.

All property records

Beauty World Plaza · Every recorded date, size and property type

2 stored versions

All retained source versions, including earlier values and repeated captures. These are source records and must not be counted as separate sales. View published history.

Recorded activity by year · all 2 records
2023
1
2025
1

Showing 1–2 of 2 records. Every page is available below; the download contains the complete dataset for this property.

MonthProperty Sale categoryTypeAreaArea basisUnitsFloor bandTenureRecorded pricePrice / sq ft Full source record
2025-04Beauty World Plaza ResaleApartment926 sq ftstrata11–5999 yrs lease commencing from 1884S$1,520,000S$1,642
All fields & provenance

URA private residential transactions · Source terms

Captured 6 Sep 2026, 12:10 SGT

{
  "id": 575812,
  "snapshot_id": "49e29c50-c7e1-40ed-9bc6-7b064eaced5d",
  "row_number": 96038,
  "place_id": "c8777e85-56cb-405e-8008-6ad9c7174f57",
  "month": "2025-04",
  "market": "private_resale",
  "sale_type": "resale",
  "property_type": "Apartment",
  "flat_type": "",
  "flat_model": "",
  "price": "1520000.00",
  "area_sqm": "86.0000",
  "area_type": "strata",
  "units": 1,
  "floor_low": 1,
  "floor_high": 5,
  "tenure": "999 yrs lease commencing from 1884",
  "remaining_lease_months": null,
  "raw_identity": {
    "area": "86",
    "price": "1520000",
    "street": "UPPER BUKIT TIMAH ROAD",
    "tenure": "999 yrs lease commencing from 1884",
    "project": "BEAUTY WORLD PLAZA",
    "district": "21",
    "source_x": "21654.9072",
    "source_y": "35993.68981",
    "noOfUnits": "1",
    "floorRange": "01-05",
    "typeOfArea": "Strata",
    "typeOfSale": "3",
    "contractDate": "0425",
    "propertyType": "Apartment",
    "marketSegment": "RCR"
  },
  "flags": [],
  "date_basis": "contract month",
  "source": "ura_resale",
  "source_url": "https://eservice.ura.gov.sg/maps/api/",
  "licence_url": "https://www.ura.gov.sg/eservices-info/maps/acceptance-grant-licence/",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-06 04:10:41.317123+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-06 08:03:00.773317+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "30bdf440a1ca0475dc0a83cda3a852f531830b0112e425efdc1527a38c1da114"
}
2023-04Beauty World Plaza ResaleApartment700 sq ftstrata16–10999 yrs lease commencing from 1884S$1,100,000S$1,572
All fields & provenance

URA private residential transactions · Source terms

Captured 6 Sep 2026, 12:10 SGT

{
  "id": 575811,
  "snapshot_id": "49e29c50-c7e1-40ed-9bc6-7b064eaced5d",
  "row_number": 96037,
  "place_id": "c8777e85-56cb-405e-8008-6ad9c7174f57",
  "month": "2023-04",
  "market": "private_resale",
  "sale_type": "resale",
  "property_type": "Apartment",
  "flat_type": "",
  "flat_model": "",
  "price": "1100000.00",
  "area_sqm": "65.0000",
  "area_type": "strata",
  "units": 1,
  "floor_low": 6,
  "floor_high": 10,
  "tenure": "999 yrs lease commencing from 1884",
  "remaining_lease_months": null,
  "raw_identity": {
    "area": "65",
    "price": "1100000",
    "street": "UPPER BUKIT TIMAH ROAD",
    "tenure": "999 yrs lease commencing from 1884",
    "project": "BEAUTY WORLD PLAZA",
    "district": "21",
    "source_x": "21654.9072",
    "source_y": "35993.68981",
    "noOfUnits": "1",
    "floorRange": "06-10",
    "typeOfArea": "Strata",
    "typeOfSale": "3",
    "contractDate": "0423",
    "propertyType": "Apartment",
    "marketSegment": "RCR"
  },
  "flags": [],
  "date_basis": "contract month",
  "source": "ura_resale",
  "source_url": "https://eservice.ura.gov.sg/maps/api/",
  "licence_url": "https://www.ura.gov.sg/eservices-info/maps/acceptance-grant-licence/",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-06 04:10:41.317123+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-06 08:03:00.773317+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "30bdf440a1ca0475dc0a83cda3a852f531830b0112e425efdc1527a38c1da114"
}

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.