Official property records

208 Boon Lay Pl: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

Eight dimensions of the evidence for this property.

53/100Overall research score
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Value: 30 out of 100Resale demand: 67 out of 100Rental appeal: 58 out of 100Connectivity: 60 out of 100Tenure resilience: 50 out of 100URA growth catalysts: 70 out of 100 Value30Resaledemand67Rentalappeal58Connectivity60EverydaylivingTenureresilience50URA growthcatalysts70En blocpotential

90% evidence coverage · 6 of 7 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: URA growth catalysts (70). Lowest supported dimension: Value (30).

Value20% weight30/100

Latest recorded sale reference: S$352,000 against a S$326,000 comparable central price. Historical evidence, not a valuation or forecast.

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

  • Comparable sales: 58 in the selected size/type cohort (2026-08) Source
  • Latest recorded sale reference: S$352,000 (2026-08) Source
  • Source checked: HDB resale transactions (2026-09-06) Source
Resale demand15% weight67/100

Resales recorded in 8 of 12 months (15 sales). Monthly activity consistency proxy, not a probability of sale.

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

  • Recorded resale activity: 2025-12 to 2026-08; selected type and tenure (2026-08) Source
Rental appeal10% weight58/100

Recorded rentals in 7 of 12 months; 12 matching flat-type records. Rental activity proxy; owner-declared rents, no unit-matched yield.

How it is assessed. 100 × months with recorded rentals / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 contracts and full source coverage. Uses the same flat type. Activity continuity, not occupancy, investment return or project-size-normalised demand.

  • Recorded HDB rentals: 12 records; 2025-10 to 2026-08 (2026-08) Source
Connectivity15% weight60/100

Lakeside MRT is approximately 818 m away in a straight line.

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Lakeside MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored

Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight50/100

Approximately 49.2 years remaining as of Sep 2026. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

  • Recorded tenure: 99-year leasehold (2026-08) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight70/100

Jurong Region Line interchanges: 2028 for these interchanges (LTA target). Matched using Boon Lay MRT as a reference.

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.8. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
  • Jurong Region Line interchanges: Under construction; 2028 for these interchanges (LTA target). Approx. 1,307 m straight-line to Boon Lay MRT reference. The new line will connect the existing rail network to more of Jurong's employment and education destinations. The elevated line may change the local environment. No unit-specific noise impact is inferred; distance is to the existing station reference. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Jurong Lake District transformation: Planned; Phased, long-term transformation. Approx. 818 m straight-line to Lakeside MRT reference. URA's plan brings together commercial Jurong Gateway and the leisure-focused Lakeside area, with more homes, employment and amenities over time. New homes also add competing supply. Proximity to a district reference station does not establish that this property is within a planning boundary. (2026-09-06) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · Not applicable

Private strata collective-sale scoring does not apply to this property class.

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

3 ROOM · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Tenure not classified. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 700 sq ft property in 208 Boon Lay Pl

Comparable sales
Comparable-sale benchmarkS$326,000

S$308,000 – S$342,750

Middle 50% of recorded prices
58 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$26,000 higher than the benchmark.

8.0%above the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$352,000
Comparable medianS$326,000
S$0S$520,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2026-08. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$458
Comparable sales
58Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
-1.6%Latest 12 months vs previous 12
Recorded tenure
Tenure not classified

Comparable recorded prices over time

Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

1990-01–2026-08
208 Boon Lay Pl quarterly median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 29157285413541 Q1 1990: S$36 / sq ft; 15 salesQ2 1990: S$38 / sq ft; 12 salesQ3 1990: S$34 / sq ft; 11 salesQ4 1990: S$41 / sq ft; 7 salesQ4 1991: S$36 / sq ft; 9 salesQ3 1992: S$36 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 1992: S$41 / sq ft; 5 salesQ1 1993: S$46 / sq ft; 9 salesQ4 1993: S$87 / sq ft; 17 salesQ1 1994: S$89 / sq ft; 8 salesQ2 1994: S$100 / sq ft; 11 salesQ3 1994: S$100 / sq ft; 7 salesQ4 1994: S$100 / sq ft; 5 salesQ1 1995: S$117 / sq ft; 10 salesQ3 1995: S$131 / sq ft; 6 salesQ4 1995: S$136 / sq ft; 7 salesQ1 1996: S$148 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 1996: S$167 / sq ft; 11 salesQ3 1996: S$193 / sq ft; 12 salesQ4 1996: S$203 / sq ft; 14 salesQ1 1997: S$210 / sq ft; 9 salesQ2 1997: S$204 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 1997: S$207 / sq ft; 11 salesQ4 1997: S$190 / sq ft; 14 salesQ1 1998: S$166 / sq ft; 21 salesQ2 1998: S$165 / sq ft; 8 salesQ3 1998: S$156 / sq ft; 9 salesQ4 1998: S$138 / sq ft; 10 salesQ1 1999: S$141 / sq ft; 13 salesQ2 1999: S$134 / sq ft; 16 salesQ3 1999: S$141 / sq ft; 8 salesQ3 2000: S$128 / sq ft; 6 salesQ4 2000: S$136 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2001: S$126 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 2001: S$119 / sq ft; 8 salesQ1 2002: S$126 / sq ft; 7 salesQ2 2002: S$131 / sq ft; 10 salesQ3 2002: S$121 / sq ft; 6 salesQ4 2002: S$139 / sq ft; 7 salesQ2 2003: S$164 / sq ft; 13 salesQ3 2003: S$172 / sq ft; 13 salesQ4 2003: S$185 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 2004: S$189 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2004: S$206 / sq ft; 11 salesQ4 2004: S$220 / sq ft; 7 salesQ1 2005: S$259 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 2005: S$254 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2005: S$207 / sq ft; 7 salesQ1 2006: S$209 / sq ft; 10 salesQ2 2006: S$214 / sq ft; 7 salesQ3 2006: S$202 / sq ft; 6 salesQ4 2006: S$212 / sq ft; 6 salesQ1 2007: S$212 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 2007: S$214 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2007: S$218 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 2008: S$259 / sq ft; 5 salesQ3 2008: S$279 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2009: S$312 / sq ft; 9 salesQ4 2009: S$312 / sq ft; 9 salesQ3 2010: S$369 / sq ft; 16 salesQ4 2010: S$376 / sq ft; 8 salesQ2 2011: S$383 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2011: S$406 / sq ft; 5 salesQ1 2012: S$416 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 2012: S$455 / sq ft; 5 salesQ3 2018: S$298 / sq ft; 5 salesQ3 2019: S$314 / sq ft; 9 salesQ3 2020: S$332 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2022: S$414 / sq ft; 5 salesQ3 2024: S$486 / sq ft; 7 salesQ2 2026: S$452 / sq ft; 8 sales Q1 1990Q2 2008Q3 2026
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View quarterly figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
Q1 199015S$36S$33–40
Q2 199012S$38S$33–43
Q3 199011S$34S$33–37
Q4 19907S$41S$33–44
Q1 19913Insufficient sales
Q2 19914Insufficient sales
Q3 19913Insufficient sales
Q4 19919S$36S$34–41
Q1 19924Insufficient sales
Q2 19923Insufficient sales
Q3 19925S$36S$36–37
Q4 19925S$41S$35–44
Q1 19939S$46S$42–48
Q2 19934Insufficient sales
Q3 19934Insufficient sales
Q4 199317S$87S$74–90
Q1 19948S$89S$86–94
Q2 199411S$100S$94–102
Q3 19947S$100S$97–109
Q4 19945S$100S$98–100
Q1 199510S$117S$109–121
Q2 19954Insufficient sales
Q3 19956S$131S$124–133
Q4 19957S$136S$131–142
Q1 19966S$148S$141–149
Q2 199611S$167S$159–173
Q3 199612S$193S$190–197
Q4 199614S$203S$200–209
Q1 19979S$210S$199–214
Q2 19976S$204S$190–210
Q3 199711S$207S$203–213
Q4 199714S$190S$179–199
Q1 199821S$166S$163–174
Q2 19988S$165S$163–169
Q3 19989S$156S$144–160
Q4 199810S$138S$136–147
Q1 199913S$141S$137–144
Q2 199916S$134S$131–139
Q3 19998S$141S$133–144
Q4 19994Insufficient sales
Q1 20004Insufficient sales
Q2 20004Insufficient sales
Q3 20006S$128S$122–134
Q4 20006S$136S$134–140
Q1 20013Insufficient sales
Q2 20011Insufficient sales
Q3 20015S$126S$119–131
Q4 20018S$119S$118–123
Q1 20027S$126S$124–134
Q2 200210S$131S$119–133
Q3 20026S$121S$121–127
Q4 20027S$139S$132–150
Q1 20033Insufficient sales
Q2 200313S$164S$157–173
Q3 200313S$172S$169–186
Q4 20036S$185S$167–194
Q1 20042Insufficient sales
Q2 20046S$189S$175–194
Q3 200411S$206S$201–214
Q4 20047S$220S$212–261
Q1 20056S$259S$226–291
Q2 20056S$254S$223–257
Q3 20057S$207S$202–215
Q4 20053Insufficient sales
Q1 200610S$209S$201–213
Q2 20067S$214S$209–217
Q3 20066S$202S$195–212
Q4 20066S$212S$209–215
Q1 20076S$212S$210–219
Q2 20076S$214S$211–219
Q3 20076S$218S$212–223
Q4 20073Insufficient sales
Q1 20084Insufficient sales
Q2 20085S$259S$257–269
Q3 20085S$279S$274–282
Q4 20082Insufficient sales
Q1 20094Insufficient sales
Q2 20099S$312S$307–314
Q3 20093Insufficient sales
Q4 20099S$312S$298–330
Q1 20104Insufficient sales
Q2 20101Insufficient sales
Q3 201016S$369S$344–381
Q4 20108S$376S$370–388
Q1 20110Insufficient sales
Q2 20116S$383S$380–392
Q3 20115S$406S$397–407
Q4 20112Insufficient sales
Q1 20125S$416S$393–429
Q2 20123Insufficient sales
Q3 20124Insufficient sales
Q4 20125S$455S$436–467
Q1 20131Insufficient sales
Q2 20132Insufficient sales
Q3 20133Insufficient sales
Q4 20133Insufficient sales
Q1 20144Insufficient sales
Q2 20141Insufficient sales
Q3 20142Insufficient sales
Q4 20144Insufficient sales
Q1 20151Insufficient sales
Q2 20153Insufficient sales
Q3 20153Insufficient sales
Q4 20152Insufficient sales
Q1 20163Insufficient sales
Q2 20163Insufficient sales
Q3 20162Insufficient sales
Q4 20162Insufficient sales
Q1 20172Insufficient sales
Q2 20172Insufficient sales
Q3 20172Insufficient sales
Q4 20173Insufficient sales
Q1 20181Insufficient sales
Q2 20182Insufficient sales
Q3 20185S$298S$297–329
Q4 20182Insufficient sales
Q1 20190Insufficient sales
Q2 20192Insufficient sales
Q3 20199S$314S$297–322
Q4 20194Insufficient sales
Q1 20203Insufficient sales
Q2 20200Insufficient sales
Q3 20205S$332S$311–336
Q4 20200Insufficient sales
Q1 20212Insufficient sales
Q2 20212Insufficient sales
Q3 20214Insufficient sales
Q4 20213Insufficient sales
Q1 20222Insufficient sales
Q2 20225S$414S$399–429
Q3 20222Insufficient sales
Q4 20223Insufficient sales
Q1 20232Insufficient sales
Q2 20231Insufficient sales
Q3 20231Insufficient sales
Q4 20232Insufficient sales
Q1 20244Insufficient sales
Q2 20243Insufficient sales
Q3 20247S$486S$472–492
Q4 20242Insufficient sales
Q1 20253Insufficient sales
Q2 20253Insufficient sales
Q3 20250Insufficient sales
Q4 20251Insufficient sales
Q1 20264Insufficient sales
Q2 20268S$452S$436–483
Q3 20262Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

JURONG WEST · HDB · Tenure not classified

58 sales · This development

60 sales

52 sales

16 sales

42 sales

Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by price proximity. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.

Where the price sits

Against other jurong west · hdb transactions

LowerHigher27 / 100

Price percentile

8.2% below the jurong west · hdb median of S$499 / sq ft.

Based on 1539 other sales. A lower relative price does not by itself establish that a property is undervalued.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of jurong west · hdb recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

1539 transactions
Recorded sale prices per square foot, with a marker for the market median and this development.S$299–359 / sq ft: 3 salesS$359–420 / sq ft: 122 salesS$420–480 / sq ft: 481 salesS$480–540 / sq ft: 469 salesS$540–600 / sq ft: 236 salesS$600–660 / sq ft: 108 salesS$660–720 / sq ft: 79 salesS$720–781 / sq ft: 24 salesS$781–841 / sq ft: 16 salesS$841–901 / sq ft: 1 salesS$299S$901 / sq ft
208 Boon Lay Pl: S$458 / sq ftMarket median: S$499 / sq ft

Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same jurong west · hdb, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.

View price bands
Price / sq ftRecorded sales
S$299–3593
S$359–420122
S$420–480481
S$480–540469
S$540–600236
S$600–660108
S$660–72079
S$720–78124
S$781–84116
S$841–9011

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

Under 750 sq ft: 12 sales (80.0%)750–1,199 sq ft: 3 sales (20.0%)1,200–1,799 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,800 sq ft and above: 0 sales (0.0%)15recorded sales
Under 750 sq ft
1280.0%
750–1,199 sq ft
320.0%
1,200–1,799 sq ft
00.0%
1,800 sq ft and above
00.0%

Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.

The sales behind the comparison

595–805 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2026-08797 sq ft7–9S$352,000S$442
2026-07700 sq ft19–21S$335,000S$479
2026-06700 sq ft7–9S$337,000S$482
2026-05700 sq ft19–21S$368,000S$526
2026-05700 sq ft19–21S$342,000S$489
2026-05797 sq ft1–3S$338,000S$424
2026-05797 sq ft1–3S$320,000S$402
2026-05700 sq ft7–9S$320,888S$459

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 58 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Contains information from HDB resale transactions, accessed from data.gov.sg under the Singapore Open Data Licence. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 09:45 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

All property records

208 Boon Lay Pl · Every recorded date, size and property type

1 building records

All published history, including archived records. No date, size, flat-type, sale-category, tenure or unit-count exclusions. Source corrections use the latest published record; all 1 retained source versions are also available.

Captured 5 Sep 2026–5 Sep 2026Download complete building records data (JSONL)

Showing 1–1 of 1 records. Every page is available below; the download contains the complete dataset for this property.

CapturedProperty Year completedMaximum floorDwelling unitsResidentialFull source record
5 Sep 2026 19:43208 Boon Lay Pl 197622431Yes
All fields & provenance

HDB property information · Source terms

Captured 5 Sep 2026, 19:43 SGT

{
  "id": 3015,
  "snapshot_id": "1d1f1e14-c054-4546-b48a-eb9ad20b1e83",
  "row_number": 3015,
  "place_id": "b6be9a56-ebc7-47c6-90a7-b96334c0519b",
  "year_completed": 1976,
  "max_floor": 22,
  "dwelling_units": 431,
  "residential": true,
  "raw_identity": {
    "blk_no": "208",
    "street": "BOON LAY PL",
    "exec_sold": "0",
    "1room_sold": "0",
    "2room_sold": "0",
    "3room_sold": "422",
    "4room_sold": "0",
    "5room_sold": "9",
    "commercial": "N",
    "residential": "Y",
    "1room_rental": "0",
    "2room_rental": "0",
    "3room_rental": "0",
    "market_hawker": "N",
    "max_floor_lvl": "22",
    "miscellaneous": "N",
    "multigen_sold": "0",
    "year_completed": "1976",
    "other_room_rental": "0",
    "precinct_pavilion": "N",
    "bldg_contract_town": "JW",
    "multistorey_carpark": "N",
    "total_dwelling_units": "431",
    "studio_apartment_sold": "0"
  },
  "source": "hdb_buildings",
  "source_url": "https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_17f5382f26140b1fdae0ba2ef6239d2f/view",
  "licence_url": "https://data.gov.sg/open-data-licence",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "a6e3105d02c4b59929371d1f7e4f8c0ed7939cdc081701d7e9197790bb78f4b1"
}

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.