Official property records
170 Boon Lay Dr: recorded history
Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.
Property Upside score
Eight dimensions of the evidence for this property.
0% evidence coverage · 0 of 7 applicable dimensions scored
The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.
Value20% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.
Resale demand15% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.
Rental appeal10% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. Requires current recorded rental contracts or published project rental medians. Reporting continuity is a proxy; unmatched rent and floor area never produce a yield.
Connectivity15% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.
Tenure resilience15% weight · Unscored—
Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.
How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.
URA growth catalysts10% weight · Unscored—
A verified property reference point is needed to match nearby planning evidence.
How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.
En bloc potential5% weight · Not applicable—
Private strata collective-sale scoring does not apply to this property class.
How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.
An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.
3 ROOM · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Tenure not classified. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.
Fair value & asking price
A 750 sq ft property in 170 Boon Lay Dr
2012-02 · 753 sq ft · S$321 / sq ft
An individual completed sale, not an estimate of your home’s value.
A recent price range needs more evidence
0 matching sales in the past 5 years; at least five are needed for a comparable range. The comparison history contains 155 sales (1990-01–2012-02), including 155 in this size band. The full property records include every size and sale category. View all property records.
Comparable recorded prices over time
Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property
Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.
View quarterly figures
| Period | Sales | Median / sq ft | Middle 50% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 1990 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1990 | 6 | S$42 | S$34–43 |
| Q3 1990 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1990 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1991 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1991 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1991 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1991 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1992 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1992 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1992 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1992 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1993 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1993 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1993 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1993 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1994 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1994 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1994 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1994 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1995 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1995 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1995 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1995 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1996 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1996 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1996 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1996 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1997 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1997 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1997 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1997 | 6 | S$175 | S$170–179 |
| Q1 1998 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 1998 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1998 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1998 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 1999 | 8 | S$135 | S$130–140 |
| Q2 1999 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 1999 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 1999 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2000 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2000 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2000 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2000 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2001 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2001 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2001 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2001 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2002 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2002 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2002 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2002 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2003 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2003 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2003 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2003 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2004 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2004 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2004 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2004 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2005 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2005 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2005 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2005 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2006 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2006 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2006 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2006 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2007 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2007 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2007 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2007 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2008 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2008 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2008 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2008 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2009 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2009 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2009 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2009 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2010 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2010 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2010 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2010 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2011 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2011 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2011 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q4 2011 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2012 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
Price versus other developments
JURONG WEST · HDB · Tenure not classified
Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by number of recorded sales. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.
Local market context
Against other jurong west · hdb transactions
1423 matching sales in other developments
Same size band and tenure not classified, over 5 years. 170 Boon Lay Dr needs five recent matching sales before we can place its median within this market.
Price versus the local market
The distribution of jurong west · hdb recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties
Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same jurong west · hdb, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.
View price bands
| Price / sq ft | Recorded sales |
|---|---|
| S$336–392 | 42 |
| S$392–449 | 255 |
| S$449–505 | 434 |
| S$505–562 | 328 |
| S$562–618 | 169 |
| S$618–675 | 98 |
| S$675–731 | 65 |
| S$731–788 | 16 |
| S$788–844 | 15 |
| S$844–901 | 1 |
What traded in this development
Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months
No matching sales were recorded in the past 12 months.
The sales behind the comparison
638–863 sq ft · Past 5 years
No recorded sales match this property area.
How to read this analysis
The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.
Contains information from HDB resale flat prices, accessed from data.gov.sg under the Singapore Open Data Licence. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 13:09 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology
Charts & price evidence
Understand what these records can tell you.
All property records
170 Boon Lay Dr · Every recorded date, size and property type
All published history, including archived records. No date, size, flat-type, sale-category, tenure or unit-count exclusions. Source corrections use the latest published record; all 0 retained source versions are also available.
No building records records have been supplied by the connected sources for this property. View source coverage.
Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.