Official property records

112 Lor 1 Toa Payoh: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

Eight dimensions of the evidence for this property.

Insufficient evidenceOverall score not yet available
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Value: 46 out of 100Rental appeal: 58 out of 100Connectivity: 100 out of 100Tenure resilience: 40 out of 100 Value46ResaledemandRentalappeal58Connectivity100EverydaylivingTenureresilience40URA growthcatalystsEn blocpotential

63% evidence coverage · 4 of 7 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Connectivity (100). Lowest supported dimension: Tenure resilience (40).

Value20% weight46/100

Latest recorded sale reference: S$350,000 against a S$345,000 comparable central price. Historical evidence, not a valuation or forecast.

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

  • Comparable sales: 14 in the selected size/type cohort (2026-06) Source
  • Latest recorded sale reference: S$350,000 (2026-06) Source
  • Source checked: HDB resale transactions (2026-09-06) Source
Resale demand15% weight · Unscored

Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

Rental appeal10% weight58/100

Recorded rentals in 7 of 12 months; 10 matching flat-type records. Rental activity proxy; owner-declared rents, no unit-matched yield.

How it is assessed. 100 × months with recorded rentals / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 contracts and full source coverage. Uses the same flat type. Activity continuity, not occupancy, investment return or project-size-normalised demand.

  • Recorded HDB rentals: 10 records; 2025-10 to 2026-08 (2026-08) Source
Connectivity15% weight100/100

Braddell MRT is approximately 205 m away in a straight line.

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Braddell MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored

Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight40/100

Approximately 39.8 years remaining as of Sep 2026. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

  • Recorded tenure: 99-year leasehold (2026-06) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight · Unscored

No current, geographically matched growth announcement in the reviewed coverage.

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 3.0. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · Not applicable

Private strata collective-sale scoring does not apply to this property class.

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

3 ROOM · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Tenure not classified. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 700 sq ft property in 112 Lor 1 Toa Payoh

Comparable sales
Comparable-sale benchmarkS$345,000

S$332,666 – S$365,000

Middle 50% of recorded prices
14 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$5,000 higher than the benchmark.

1.4%above the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$350,000
Comparable medianS$345,000
S$0S$550,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2026-06. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$493
Comparable sales
14Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
Limited historyNeeds five sales in each year
Recorded tenure
Tenure not classified

Comparable recorded prices over time

Half-yearly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

1990-06–2026-06
112 Lor 1 Toa Payoh half-yearly median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 127201275349423 H1 1995: S$156 / sq ft; 7 salesH1 1996: S$229 / sq ft; 6 salesH1 1999: S$219 / sq ft; 5 salesH2 2000: S$243 / sq ft; 7 salesH2 2008: S$375 / sq ft; 6 sales H1 1990H1 2008H1 2026
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View half-yearly figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
H1 19901Insufficient sales
H2 19901Insufficient sales
H1 19914Insufficient sales
H2 19911Insufficient sales
H1 19921Insufficient sales
H2 19923Insufficient sales
H1 19934Insufficient sales
H2 19932Insufficient sales
H1 19940Insufficient sales
H2 19942Insufficient sales
H1 19957S$156S$141–168
H2 19951Insufficient sales
H1 19966S$229S$217–257
H2 19961Insufficient sales
H1 19971Insufficient sales
H2 19974Insufficient sales
H1 19983Insufficient sales
H2 19984Insufficient sales
H1 19995S$219S$211–222
H2 19994Insufficient sales
H1 20002Insufficient sales
H2 20007S$243S$239–254
H1 20011Insufficient sales
H2 20012Insufficient sales
H1 20022Insufficient sales
H2 20021Insufficient sales
H1 20031Insufficient sales
H2 20032Insufficient sales
H1 20042Insufficient sales
H2 20041Insufficient sales
H1 20052Insufficient sales
H2 20053Insufficient sales
H1 20063Insufficient sales
H2 20062Insufficient sales
H1 20073Insufficient sales
H2 20071Insufficient sales
H1 20083Insufficient sales
H2 20086S$375S$368–384
H1 20094Insufficient sales
H2 20090Insufficient sales
H1 20102Insufficient sales
H2 20102Insufficient sales
H1 20113Insufficient sales
H2 20111Insufficient sales
H1 20120Insufficient sales
H2 20122Insufficient sales
H1 20131Insufficient sales
H2 20130Insufficient sales
H1 20141Insufficient sales
H2 20141Insufficient sales
H1 20152Insufficient sales
H2 20151Insufficient sales
H1 20160Insufficient sales
H2 20162Insufficient sales
H1 20171Insufficient sales
H2 20172Insufficient sales
H1 20182Insufficient sales
H2 20181Insufficient sales
H1 20192Insufficient sales
H2 20193Insufficient sales
H1 20200Insufficient sales
H2 20203Insufficient sales
H1 20211Insufficient sales
H2 20213Insufficient sales
H1 20220Insufficient sales
H2 20221Insufficient sales
H1 20231Insufficient sales
H2 20231Insufficient sales
H1 20242Insufficient sales
H2 20241Insufficient sales
H1 20250Insufficient sales
H2 20251Insufficient sales
H1 20264Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

TOA PAYOH · HDB · Tenure not classified

14 sales · This development

12 sales

Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by price proximity. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.

Where the price sits

Against other toa payoh · hdb transactions

LowerHigher37 / 100

Price percentile

4.7% below the toa payoh · hdb median of S$518 / sq ft.

Based on 1815 other sales. A lower relative price does not by itself establish that a property is undervalued.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of toa payoh · hdb recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

1815 transactions
Recorded sale prices per square foot, with a marker for the market median and this development.S$309–407 / sq ft: 43 salesS$407–505 / sq ft: 727 salesS$505–604 / sq ft: 634 salesS$604–702 / sq ft: 82 salesS$702–800 / sq ft: 55 salesS$800–898 / sq ft: 38 salesS$898–996 / sq ft: 67 salesS$996–1,095 / sq ft: 99 salesS$1,095–1,193 / sq ft: 64 salesS$1,193–1,291 / sq ft: 6 salesS$309S$1,291 / sq ft
112 Lor 1 Toa Payoh: S$493 / sq ftMarket median: S$518 / sq ft

Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same toa payoh · hdb, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.

View price bands
Price / sq ftRecorded sales
S$309–40743
S$407–505727
S$505–604634
S$604–70282
S$702–80055
S$800–89838
S$898–99667
S$996–1,09599
S$1,095–1,19364
S$1,193–1,2916

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

Under 750 sq ft: 4 sales (100.0%)750–1,199 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,200–1,799 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,800 sq ft and above: 0 sales (0.0%)4recorded sales
Under 750 sq ft
4100.0%
750–1,199 sq ft
00.0%
1,200–1,799 sq ft
00.0%
1,800 sq ft and above
00.0%

Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.

The sales behind the comparison

595–805 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2026-06700 sq ft7–9S$350,000S$500
2026-05700 sq ft1–3S$345,000S$493
2026-02700 sq ft4–6S$418,000S$597
2026-01700 sq ft1–3S$343,000S$490
2025-07700 sq ft4–6S$375,000S$536
2024-08700 sq ft1–3S$346,000S$495
2024-06700 sq ft4–6S$370,000S$529
2024-05700 sq ft4–6S$378,000S$540

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 14 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Contains information from HDB resale transactions, accessed from data.gov.sg under the Singapore Open Data Licence. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 09:45 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

All property records

112 Lor 1 Toa Payoh · Every recorded date, size and property type

1 building records

All published history, including archived records. No date, size, flat-type, sale-category, tenure or unit-count exclusions. Source corrections use the latest published record; all 1 retained source versions are also available.

Captured 5 Sep 2026–5 Sep 2026Download complete building records data (JSONL)

Showing 1–1 of 1 records. Every page is available below; the download contains the complete dataset for this property.

CapturedProperty Year completedMaximum floorDwelling unitsResidentialFull source record
5 Sep 2026 19:43112 Lor 1 Toa Payoh 196710119Yes
All fields & provenance

HDB property information · Source terms

Captured 5 Sep 2026, 19:43 SGT

{
  "id": 593,
  "snapshot_id": "1d1f1e14-c054-4546-b48a-eb9ad20b1e83",
  "row_number": 593,
  "place_id": "6a0620ea-bccf-46ee-800b-bb1e551235fd",
  "year_completed": 1967,
  "max_floor": 10,
  "dwelling_units": 119,
  "residential": true,
  "raw_identity": {
    "blk_no": "112",
    "street": "LOR 1 TOA PAYOH",
    "exec_sold": "0",
    "1room_sold": "0",
    "2room_sold": "0",
    "3room_sold": "118",
    "4room_sold": "0",
    "5room_sold": "1",
    "commercial": "N",
    "residential": "Y",
    "1room_rental": "0",
    "2room_rental": "0",
    "3room_rental": "0",
    "market_hawker": "N",
    "max_floor_lvl": "10",
    "miscellaneous": "N",
    "multigen_sold": "0",
    "year_completed": "1967",
    "other_room_rental": "0",
    "precinct_pavilion": "N",
    "bldg_contract_town": "TP",
    "multistorey_carpark": "N",
    "total_dwelling_units": "119",
    "studio_apartment_sold": "0"
  },
  "source": "hdb_buildings",
  "source_url": "https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_17f5382f26140b1fdae0ba2ef6239d2f/view",
  "licence_url": "https://data.gov.sg/open-data-licence",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "a6e3105d02c4b59929371d1f7e4f8c0ed7939cdc081701d7e9197790bb78f4b1"
}

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.