Official property records

6 Holland Cl: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

What helps, what holds it back, and the evidence behind each score.

Insufficient evidenceOverall score not yet available
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Value: 59 out of 100Rental appeal: 75 out of 100Connectivity: 80 out of 100Everyday living: 69 out of 100Tenure resilience: 47 out of 100 Value59ResaledemandRentalappeal75Connectivity80Everydayliving69Tenureresilience47URA growthcatalystsEn blocpotential

74% evidence coverage · 5 of 7 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Connectivity (80). Lowest supported dimension: Tenure resilience (47).

Value20% weight59/100Latest recorded sale reference of S$426,888 is 3.4% below the S$442,000 comparable central price, based on 27 compatible sales. Being below comparable sales lifts the score above the 50-point midpoint. This is a historical comparison, not a valuation or forecast.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

  • Comparable sales: 27 in the selected size/type cohort (2026-04) Source
  • Latest recorded sale reference: S$426,888 (2026-04) Source
  • Source checked: HDB resale transactions (2026-09-06) Source
Resale demand15% weight · UnscoredWe cannot yet judge how regularly homes in this segment resell. This needs at least 5 matching resales and a source covering 12 completed months; missing records are not evidence of weak demand.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

Rental appeal10% weight75/100Rentals were recorded in 9 of 12 completed months, based on 24 matching flat-type records. More months with recorded activity earn a higher score, so regular activity helps and gaps bring it down. These are owner-declared records; gaps do not prove vacancy and the score does not measure rental returns.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 100 × months with recorded rentals / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 contracts and full source coverage. Uses the same flat type. Activity continuity, not occupancy, investment return or project-size-normalised demand.

  • Recorded HDB rentals: 24 records; 2025-09 to 2026-08 (2026-08) Source
Connectivity15% weight80/100The nearest recorded operational MRT is Buona Vista MRT, approximately 527 m away. Being more than 400 m but within 800 m earns 80 points; closer stations score higher. This is straight-line distance; the actual walking route may be longer.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Buona Vista MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight69/100Across schools, food, parks and shopping, the nearest recorded amenity is Holland Drive Blk 44 (Holland Drive Market And Food Centre) (312 m) and the farthest category is represented by Anchorpoint (2,324 m). Each category contributes equally: closer amenities lift the average and farther ones bring it down. Distances are straight-line; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

  • School: New Town Primary School: 987 m straight-line (2026-09-06) Source
  • Food: Holland Drive Blk 44 (Holland Drive Market And Food Centre): 312 m straight-line (2026-09-06) Source
  • Park: Holland Village Pk: 506 m straight-line (2026-09-06) Source
  • Shopping: Anchorpoint: 2,324 m straight-line (2026-09-06) Source
Tenure resilience15% weight47/100The selected records indicate approximately 46.8 years remaining as of Sep 2026. The score compares that remaining time with a 99-year lease: more years left raise the score, up to 100, while a shorter lease brings it down. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

  • Recorded tenure: 99-year leasehold (2026-04) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight · UnscoredNo current, geographically matched growth announcement in the reviewed coverage.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 3.0. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · Not applicableThis metric follows collective-sale activity for private strata developments, so it does not apply to this property type.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

3 ROOM · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Tenure not classified. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 700 sq ft property in 6 Holland Cl

Comparable sales
Comparable-sale benchmarkS$442,000

S$412,500 – S$497,500

Middle 50% of recorded prices
27 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$15,112 lower than the benchmark.

3.4%below the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$426,888
Comparable medianS$442,000
S$0S$700,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2026-04. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$632
Comparable sales
27Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
Limited historyNeeds five sales in each year
Recorded tenure
Tenure not classified

Comparable recorded prices over time

Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

1990-01–2026-04
6 Holland Cl quarterly median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 46201356510665 Q3 1990: S$55 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 1993: S$114 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 1995: S$202 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 1996: S$289 / sq ft; 7 salesQ1 1997: S$290 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 1998: S$229 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 1998: S$224 / sq ft; 8 salesQ4 1998: S$213 / sq ft; 12 salesQ1 1999: S$206 / sq ft; 5 salesQ3 1999: S$217 / sq ft; 8 salesQ3 2000: S$226 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 2000: S$236 / sq ft; 5 salesQ1 2001: S$222 / sq ft; 5 salesQ3 2002: S$218 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2003: S$243 / sq ft; 9 salesQ4 2003: S$247 / sq ft; 6 salesQ1 2004: S$260 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 2007: S$372 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2008: S$410 / sq ft; 8 salesQ4 2009: S$470 / sq ft; 8 salesQ3 2010: S$566 / sq ft; 6 salesQ3 2018: S$503 / sq ft; 7 salesQ1 2021: S$479 / sq ft; 6 sales Q1 1990Q2 2008Q2 2026
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View quarterly figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
Q1 19902Insufficient sales
Q2 19904Insufficient sales
Q3 19905S$55S$51–57
Q4 19901Insufficient sales
Q1 19913Insufficient sales
Q2 19911Insufficient sales
Q3 19911Insufficient sales
Q4 19910Insufficient sales
Q1 19923Insufficient sales
Q2 19922Insufficient sales
Q3 19922Insufficient sales
Q4 19924Insufficient sales
Q1 19932Insufficient sales
Q2 19931Insufficient sales
Q3 19931Insufficient sales
Q4 19935S$114S$111–143
Q1 19943Insufficient sales
Q2 19944Insufficient sales
Q3 19944Insufficient sales
Q4 19942Insufficient sales
Q1 19950Insufficient sales
Q2 19953Insufficient sales
Q3 19954Insufficient sales
Q4 19955S$202S$177–206
Q1 19963Insufficient sales
Q2 19964Insufficient sales
Q3 19964Insufficient sales
Q4 19967S$289S$272–312
Q1 19975S$290S$277–293
Q2 19970Insufficient sales
Q3 19971Insufficient sales
Q4 19972Insufficient sales
Q1 19982Insufficient sales
Q2 19986S$229S$218–239
Q3 19988S$224S$216–235
Q4 199812S$213S$208–223
Q1 19995S$206S$204–207
Q2 19992Insufficient sales
Q3 19998S$217S$212–228
Q4 19994Insufficient sales
Q1 20000Insufficient sales
Q2 20004Insufficient sales
Q3 20005S$226S$224–229
Q4 20005S$236S$230–236
Q1 20015S$222S$217–223
Q2 20014Insufficient sales
Q3 20013Insufficient sales
Q4 20013Insufficient sales
Q1 20024Insufficient sales
Q2 20024Insufficient sales
Q3 20026S$218S$207–227
Q4 20024Insufficient sales
Q1 20032Insufficient sales
Q2 20031Insufficient sales
Q3 20039S$243S$228–272
Q4 20036S$247S$229–274
Q1 20045S$260S$257–276
Q2 20041Insufficient sales
Q3 20044Insufficient sales
Q4 20042Insufficient sales
Q1 20051Insufficient sales
Q2 20053Insufficient sales
Q3 20052Insufficient sales
Q4 20052Insufficient sales
Q1 20064Insufficient sales
Q2 20063Insufficient sales
Q3 20063Insufficient sales
Q4 20060Insufficient sales
Q1 20072Insufficient sales
Q2 20074Insufficient sales
Q3 20073Insufficient sales
Q4 20075S$372S$346–424
Q1 20084Insufficient sales
Q2 20088S$410S$397–438
Q3 20084Insufficient sales
Q4 20082Insufficient sales
Q1 20093Insufficient sales
Q2 20092Insufficient sales
Q3 20094Insufficient sales
Q4 20098S$470S$465–496
Q1 20101Insufficient sales
Q2 20104Insufficient sales
Q3 20106S$566S$552–605
Q4 20100Insufficient sales
Q1 20112Insufficient sales
Q2 20112Insufficient sales
Q3 20112Insufficient sales
Q4 20111Insufficient sales
Q1 20120Insufficient sales
Q2 20122Insufficient sales
Q3 20123Insufficient sales
Q4 20121Insufficient sales
Q1 20133Insufficient sales
Q2 20132Insufficient sales
Q3 20130Insufficient sales
Q4 20130Insufficient sales
Q1 20141Insufficient sales
Q2 20140Insufficient sales
Q3 20141Insufficient sales
Q4 20142Insufficient sales
Q1 20150Insufficient sales
Q2 20151Insufficient sales
Q3 20150Insufficient sales
Q4 20152Insufficient sales
Q1 20163Insufficient sales
Q2 20161Insufficient sales
Q3 20161Insufficient sales
Q4 20162Insufficient sales
Q1 20171Insufficient sales
Q2 20171Insufficient sales
Q3 20172Insufficient sales
Q4 20171Insufficient sales
Q1 20181Insufficient sales
Q2 20180Insufficient sales
Q3 20187S$503S$495–523
Q4 20183Insufficient sales
Q1 20191Insufficient sales
Q2 20190Insufficient sales
Q3 20191Insufficient sales
Q4 20193Insufficient sales
Q1 20201Insufficient sales
Q2 20200Insufficient sales
Q3 20202Insufficient sales
Q4 20202Insufficient sales
Q1 20216S$479S$461–507
Q2 20210Insufficient sales
Q3 20214Insufficient sales
Q4 20212Insufficient sales
Q1 20222Insufficient sales
Q2 20220Insufficient sales
Q3 20222Insufficient sales
Q4 20220Insufficient sales
Q1 20230Insufficient sales
Q2 20233Insufficient sales
Q3 20231Insufficient sales
Q4 20230Insufficient sales
Q1 20242Insufficient sales
Q2 20241Insufficient sales
Q3 20243Insufficient sales
Q4 20244Insufficient sales
Q1 20250Insufficient sales
Q2 20253Insufficient sales
Q3 20252Insufficient sales
Q4 20251Insufficient sales
Q1 20260Insufficient sales
Q2 20261Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

QUEENSTOWN · HDB · Tenure not classified

27 sales · This development

34 sales

39 sales

38 sales

27 sales

Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by price proximity. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.

Where the price sits

Against other queenstown · hdb transactions

LowerHigher62 / 100

Price percentile

9.6% above the queenstown · hdb median of S$577 / sq ft.

Based on 1469 other sales. A lower relative price does not by itself establish that a property is undervalued.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of queenstown · hdb recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

1469 transactions
Recorded sale prices per square foot, with a marker for the market median and this development.S$368–474 / sq ft: 154 salesS$474–581 / sq ft: 592 salesS$581–687 / sq ft: 237 salesS$687–794 / sq ft: 83 salesS$794–900 / sq ft: 74 salesS$900–1,006 / sq ft: 117 salesS$1,006–1,113 / sq ft: 91 salesS$1,113–1,219 / sq ft: 81 salesS$1,219–1,326 / sq ft: 34 salesS$1,326–1,432 / sq ft: 6 salesS$368S$1,432 / sq ft
6 Holland Cl: S$632 / sq ftMarket median: S$577 / sq ft

Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same queenstown · hdb, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.

View price bands
Price / sq ftRecorded sales
S$368–474154
S$474–581592
S$581–687237
S$687–79483
S$794–90074
S$900–1,006117
S$1,006–1,11391
S$1,113–1,21981
S$1,219–1,32634
S$1,326–1,4326

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

Under 750 sq ft: 2 sales (100.0%)750–1,199 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,200–1,799 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,800 sq ft and above: 0 sales (0.0%)2recorded sales
Under 750 sq ft
2100.0%
750–1,199 sq ft
00.0%
1,200–1,799 sq ft
00.0%
1,800 sq ft and above
00.0%

Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.

The sales behind the comparison

595–805 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2026-04700 sq ft10–12S$426,888S$610
2025-11700 sq ft19–21S$500,000S$715
2025-09700 sq ft13–15S$400,000S$572
2025-08786 sq ft7–9S$510,000S$649
2025-06700 sq ft19–21S$385,000S$550
2025-06700 sq ft4–6S$445,000S$636
2025-04786 sq ft16–18S$508,000S$647
2024-11700 sq ft10–12S$470,000S$672

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 27 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Contains information from HDB resale transactions, accessed from data.gov.sg under the Singapore Open Data Licence. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 09:45 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

All property records

6 Holland Cl · Every recorded date, size and property type

1 stored versions

All retained source versions, including earlier values and repeated captures. These are source records and must not be counted as separate sales. View published history.

Captured 5 Sep 2026–5 Sep 2026Download complete building records data (JSONL)

Showing 1–1 of 1 records. Every page is available below; the download contains the complete dataset for this property.

CapturedProperty Year completedMaximum floorDwelling unitsResidentialFull source record
5 Sep 2026 19:436 Holland Cl 197322369Yes
All fields & provenance

HDB property information · Source terms

Captured 5 Sep 2026, 19:43 SGT

{
  "id": 9630,
  "snapshot_id": "1d1f1e14-c054-4546-b48a-eb9ad20b1e83",
  "row_number": 9630,
  "place_id": "1fcfb9f3-d6c2-463d-a4a3-be7d6a7e8439",
  "year_completed": 1973,
  "max_floor": 22,
  "dwelling_units": 369,
  "residential": true,
  "raw_identity": {
    "blk_no": "6",
    "street": "HOLLAND CL",
    "exec_sold": "0",
    "1room_sold": "0",
    "2room_sold": "0",
    "3room_sold": "276",
    "4room_sold": "84",
    "5room_sold": "3",
    "commercial": "Y",
    "residential": "Y",
    "1room_rental": "0",
    "2room_rental": "0",
    "3room_rental": "6",
    "market_hawker": "N",
    "max_floor_lvl": "22",
    "miscellaneous": "N",
    "multigen_sold": "0",
    "year_completed": "1973",
    "other_room_rental": "0",
    "precinct_pavilion": "N",
    "bldg_contract_town": "QT",
    "multistorey_carpark": "N",
    "total_dwelling_units": "369",
    "studio_apartment_sold": "0"
  },
  "source": "hdb_buildings",
  "source_url": "https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_17f5382f26140b1fdae0ba2ef6239d2f/view",
  "licence_url": "https://data.gov.sg/open-data-licence",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "a6e3105d02c4b59929371d1f7e4f8c0ed7939cdc081701d7e9197790bb78f4b1"
}

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.