Official property records

164 Simei Rd: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

What helps, what holds it back, and the evidence behind each score.

Insufficient evidenceOverall score not yet available
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Connectivity: 80 out of 100 ValueResaledemandRentalappealConnectivity80EverydaylivingTenureresilienceURA growthcatalystsEn blocpotential

16% evidence coverage · 1 of 7 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Connectivity (80).

Value20% weight · UnscoredOnly 4 compatible sales are available in this comparison. At least 5 are needed to score value, so a small sample does not become a good or bad price verdict.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

Resale demand15% weight · UnscoredWe cannot yet judge how regularly homes in this segment resell. This needs at least 5 matching resales and a source covering 12 completed months; missing records are not evidence of weak demand.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

Rental appeal10% weight · UnscoredWe need at least 5 rental records matching this flat type and a current source covering 12 completed months before scoring rental activity. The available evidence does not meet those requirements; this does not mean the flat is hard to rent.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Requires current recorded rental contracts or published project rental medians. Reporting continuity is a proxy; unmatched rent and floor area never produce a yield.

Connectivity15% weight80/100The nearest recorded operational MRT is Upper Changi MRT, approximately 629 m away. Being more than 400 m but within 800 m earns 80 points; closer stations score higher. This is straight-line distance; the actual walking route may be longer.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Upper Changi MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · UnscoredWe do not have current, verified nearby location evidence for shopping. All four everyday amenity categories are needed for a fair score. This does not mean those amenities are absent.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight · UnscoredThe selected sale records do not establish a consistent, usable tenure or remaining lease. We need an explicit freehold title or enough lease information to calculate the years left.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

URA growth catalysts10% weight · UnscoredNo current, geographically matched growth announcement in the reviewed coverage.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.8. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · Not applicableThis metric follows collective-sale activity for private strata developments, so it does not apply to this property type.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

4 ROOM · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Tenure not classified. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 1,120 sq ft property in 164 Simei Rd

Limited evidence
Latest matching recorded saleS$628,000

2025-05 · 1119 sq ft · S$561 / sq ft

An individual completed sale, not an estimate of your home’s value.

A recent price range needs more evidence

4 matching sales in the past 5 years; at least five are needed for a comparable range. The comparison history contains 60 sales (1994-01–2025-05), including 60 in this size band. The full property records include every size and sale category. View all property records.

Comparable recorded prices over time

Annual recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

1994-01–2025-05
164 Simei Rd annual median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 217257298338378 1996: S$335 / sq ft; 5 sales1999: S$252 / sq ft; 5 sales 199420102025
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View annual figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
19943Insufficient sales
19953Insufficient sales
19965S$335S$331–344
19971Insufficient sales
19984Insufficient sales
19995S$252S$241–264
20001Insufficient sales
20013Insufficient sales
20023Insufficient sales
20033Insufficient sales
20040Insufficient sales
20052Insufficient sales
20064Insufficient sales
20071Insufficient sales
20081Insufficient sales
20090Insufficient sales
20102Insufficient sales
20113Insufficient sales
20122Insufficient sales
20131Insufficient sales
20142Insufficient sales
20151Insufficient sales
20161Insufficient sales
20170Insufficient sales
20181Insufficient sales
20191Insufficient sales
20202Insufficient sales
20211Insufficient sales
20220Insufficient sales
20231Insufficient sales
20242Insufficient sales
20251Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

TAMPINES · HDB · Tenure not classified

37 sales

36 sales

30 sales

30 sales

Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by number of recorded sales. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.

Local market context

Against other tampines · hdb transactions

TAMPINES · HDB median / sq ftS$562

3512 matching sales in other developments

Same size band and tenure not classified, over 5 years. 164 Simei Rd needs five recent matching sales before we can place its median within this market.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of tampines · hdb recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

3512 transactions
Recorded sale prices per square foot, with a marker for the market median.S$320–384 / sq ft: 8 salesS$384–449 / sq ft: 277 salesS$449–513 / sq ft: 739 salesS$513–577 / sq ft: 952 salesS$577–642 / sq ft: 528 salesS$642–706 / sq ft: 222 salesS$706–770 / sq ft: 459 salesS$770–834 / sq ft: 300 salesS$834–899 / sq ft: 26 salesS$899–963 / sq ft: 1 salesS$320S$963 / sq ft
Market median: S$562 / sq ft

Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same tampines · hdb, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.

View price bands
Price / sq ftRecorded sales
S$320–3848
S$384–449277
S$449–513739
S$513–577952
S$577–642528
S$642–706222
S$706–770459
S$770–834300
S$834–89926
S$899–9631

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

No matching sales were recorded in the past 12 months.

The sales behind the comparison

952–1,288 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2025-051119 sq ft4–6S$628,000S$561
2024-061119 sq ft4–6S$592,000S$529
2024-061119 sq ft7–9S$620,000S$554
2023-011119 sq ft4–6S$530,000S$473

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 4 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Contains information from HDB resale transactions, accessed from data.gov.sg under the Singapore Open Data Licence. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 09:45 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

All property records

164 Simei Rd · Every recorded date, size and property type

1 stored versions

All retained source versions, including earlier values and repeated captures. These are source records and must not be counted as separate sales. View published history.

Captured 5 Sep 2026–5 Sep 2026Download complete building records data (JSONL)

Showing 1–1 of 1 records. Every page is available below; the download contains the complete dataset for this property.

CapturedProperty Year completedMaximum floorDwelling unitsResidentialFull source record
5 Sep 2026 19:43164 Simei Rd 19881180Yes
All fields & provenance

HDB property information · Source terms

Captured 5 Sep 2026, 19:43 SGT

{
  "id": 2083,
  "snapshot_id": "1d1f1e14-c054-4546-b48a-eb9ad20b1e83",
  "row_number": 2083,
  "place_id": "f588a55e-0742-4145-8099-cf53b213a0fb",
  "year_completed": 1988,
  "max_floor": 11,
  "dwelling_units": 80,
  "residential": true,
  "raw_identity": {
    "blk_no": "164",
    "street": "SIMEI RD",
    "exec_sold": "0",
    "1room_sold": "0",
    "2room_sold": "0",
    "3room_sold": "0",
    "4room_sold": "44",
    "5room_sold": "36",
    "commercial": "N",
    "residential": "Y",
    "1room_rental": "0",
    "2room_rental": "0",
    "3room_rental": "0",
    "market_hawker": "N",
    "max_floor_lvl": "11",
    "miscellaneous": "N",
    "multigen_sold": "0",
    "year_completed": "1988",
    "other_room_rental": "0",
    "precinct_pavilion": "N",
    "bldg_contract_town": "TAP",
    "multistorey_carpark": "N",
    "total_dwelling_units": "80",
    "studio_apartment_sold": "0"
  },
  "source": "hdb_buildings",
  "source_url": "https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_17f5382f26140b1fdae0ba2ef6239d2f/view",
  "licence_url": "https://data.gov.sg/open-data-licence",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-05 11:43:49.228448+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "a6e3105d02c4b59929371d1f7e4f8c0ed7939cdc081701d7e9197790bb78f4b1"
}

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.